IMPROVING PATIENT SAFETY THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PHARMACIST-LED BLOOD MONITORING CLINIC FOR JAK INHIBITORS IN RHEUMATOLOGY

BackgroundJanus kinase inhibitors drugs (JAKi) are novel small molecule medications known to cause abnormalities such as elevations in hepatic transaminases, decreases in neutrophil and lymphocyte counts and elevations in cholesterol and creatinine kinase. Blood monitoring is recommended and dose adjustments are advised if abnormalities arise. Recent warnings by the EMA and MHRA have highlighted the importance of monitoring these medications.Timely review and management of patients on JAKi drugs is difficult to maintain with increasing workload amongst the rheumatology team. A baseline audit (2020) demonstrated that hospital blood monitoring guidelines for JAKi drugs were not being followed. The rheumatology multidisciplinary team met and utilised Quality Improvement methodology including fish and driver diagrams to address this. This led to the creation of a pharmacist-led JAKi blood monitoring clinic.ObjectivesTo establish a pharmacist-led rheumatology blood monitoring clinic for the JAKi drug class in order to: increase patient safety with increased compliance to blood monitoring, save consultant/nurse time, improve communication with primary care on the frequency of blood testing required, increase patient understanding of the importance of blood monitoring with JAKi drugs, reinforce counselling advice such as risk of infections, shingles and thrombosis and promote medication adherence.MethodsThe clinic was established in March 2021. Patients commencing JAKi drugs are referred to the pharmacist-led clinic by the medical team. The pharmacist contacts the patient by phone following delivery of their medication. The patient is counselled on their new medication and dates for blood checks are agreed. A letter is sent to the patient and their GP providing this information. The patient is booked into virtual telephone appointments and bloods are monitored every month for the first 3 months and every 3 months thereafter. Any change or abnormality in blood results are flagged early in the patient's treatment and if necessary, discussed with the consultant. Adjustments are made to the patient's dose if appropriate.ResultsIn order to evaluate the benefit of the pharmacist clinic a re-audit of compliance with blood monitoring (March 2021- September 2022) was carried out alongside a patient satisfaction postal survey (August 2022).A total of 58 patients were sampled in the re-audit. The re-audit found an increase in compliance in blood monitoring since the introduction of the pharmacist clinic. 98% of patients had their full blood count performed at 3 months compared to 56% in audit 1 and 95% of patients had their lipid profile completed at 3 months compared to 15% in audit 1 (Table 1).A patient satisfaction survey (N=62, response rate 48%) found that 28 (93%) patients either agreed or strongly agreed that they were more aware of the importance of attending for regular blood monitoring when prescribed JAKi therapy as a result of the clinic.The pharmacy team made several significant interventions (self-graded Eadon grade 4 and 5). For example by improving medication adherence, detecting haematological abnormalities that required JAKi dose reduction, identifying patients suffering from infection requiring intervention including shingles and Covid-19.Table 1.Comparison of audit results pre (Audit 1) and post (Audit 2) clinic establishmentAudit 1 (N=48)Audit 2 (N=58)Number of patients with full blood count completed at weeks 4, 8 & 1227 (56%)57 (98%)Number of patients with lipid profile completed at week 127 (15%)55 (95%)Number of patients LFTs completed at weeks 4, 8 & 1226 (54%)54 (93%)ConclusionIntroduction of the pharmacist-led clinic has increased patient safety by ensuring compliance with blood monitoring as per hospital guidelines. The clinic has paved the way for improved communication with primary care teams and has provided patients with extra support during their first months on treatment with their JAKi. It has also expanded the role of the rheumatology pharmacy team and saved nursing and medical time.Acknowled ementsI wish to thank the SHSCT Rheumatology team for all their help, support and guidance with this project.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Implementation of a novel patientreported outcomes measure for patients with cancer and COVID-19 infection

Background: The long-term symptoms from COVID-19 (C19) infection in pts with cancer is not fully known. To monitor the evolution of this symptom burden over time, we designed and implemented a C19-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that integrated with a known measure of cancer symptom burden. Methods: Within the institutional initiative on C19 and cancer named Data-Driven Determinants for C19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE), pts with cancer & PCR-pos C19 are invited to participate in this longitudinal study. Pts complete the EQ-5D-5L, the 13 symptom severity & 6 interference items of the core MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)+14 COVID-specific items, all scored on a 0-10 scale, 0 = none, 10 = worst imaginable. Pts complete the survey daily x 14 days from positive test date, then weekly x 3months, then monthly x 2yrs. Demographic and disease information was collected. Psychometric procedures determined validity and reliability of the MDASI-COVID. Results: Between 5/15/20-02/14/21, 2154 pts w PCR-confirmed C19 were invited to participate in the longitudinal study. 1282 (60%) pts provided consent and began the longitudinal completion of PRO surveys. Pts were 54.5% Female and 45.5% Male, median age 59 years (range 15-92). 1021 (80%) are White/Caucasian, 206 (16%) Hispanic, 113 (9%) African American, and 39 (3%) Asian. The validation analysis of MDASI-COVID instrument included the 1 600 pts where the mean overall health rating on EQ-5D-5L was 78.3 (SD 19.6), best being 100. Highest mean (M) severity symptoms on the MDASI-COVID were fatigue (M 3.45, SD 2.17), drowsiness (M 2.50, SD 2.89), sleep disturbance (M 2.44, SD 2.99), malaise (M 2.37, SD 3.05), and distress (M 2.27, SD 2.90). Most severe (≥ 7) symptoms) reported were fatigue (21.3% of pts), change in taste (14.8%), change in smell (14.4%), malaise (14.3%), sleep disturbance (14.3%), and drowsiness (14%). showed internal consistency (Cronbach α) of the 27 symptom items was 0.957, of the 6 interference items was 0.937. Mean severity of the 27 symptom items was significantly correlated with overall EQ-5D-5L health rating (correlation =-0.45, P < 0.0005), demonstrating concurrent validity. Mean symptom severity and interference showed known-group validity between pts who required hospitalization (symptom M 2.32, SD 2.09;interference M 3.29, SD 3.02) and those who did not (symptom M 1.69, SD 1.85;interference M 2.20, SD 2.64) (symptom P 0.007;interference P 0.004). Conclusions: We successfully deployed a PRObased long-term symptom monitoring platform for pts with C19 and cancer. The validation analysis of this novel C19 specific PRO, the MDASI-COVID, AIDS in the quantification of the global symptom burden in pts with both cancer and COVID-19 infection. Deployment of this measure in the ongoing longitudinal observational cohort allows for in-depth understanding of the long-term symptoms related to C19 and cancer.

Real-world patient-reported and clinical outcomes of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer

Background: Most COVID-19 (C19) vaccine trials excluded patients with active cancer. Here, we report our real-world patient-reported and clinical outcomes of BNT162b2 mRNA C19 vaccine in patients with cancer. Methods: Our institutional Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) follows a longitudinal observational cohort of pts w cancer getting C19 vaccine. Pts complete a validated PRO tool, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI, 13 core, 6 interference plus 17 items of symptoms from prior vaccine trials) pre-dose 1, then daily x 6d, then weekly, then on day of dose 2, then daily x 6d, then weekly x 3w. Demographics, cancer variables, prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), C19 status pre- & post-vaccine are aggregated via Syntropy platform: Palantir Foundry. Primary outcome is incidence of PRO symptoms bw dose 1 & 2 across AYA 15-39y, mid-age 40-64y & senior 65y+ cohorts. Secondary outcomes include PRO symptom incidence post-dose 2, post-vaccine change in cancer symptoms, post-vaccine symptom severity based on prior ICI, and confirmed C19 > 7 days post-dose 2. First planned 8-wk interim analysis is reported here. Results: 6388 pts w cancer (4973 w mets) received a BNT162b2 vaccine dose (4811 both doses, 1577 received one & await dose 2). Overall, median age 64y (range 16-95y);382 AYAs, 2927 mid-age, 3079 seniors (65-70y n = 1158, 70-79y n = 1521, 80-89y n = 378, 90y+ n = 22). 4099 (64%) are White, 823 (13%) AA, 791 (12%) Hispanic, 441 (7%) Asians. Primary cancers: breast (1397), GU (821), heme (775), thoracic/HN (745), and CRC (385). Prior to dose 1, 1862 had no prior systemic tx while 4526 pts did including 3243 who had only non-IO tx (chemo, targeted tx), 1,283 had immunotherapy including 857 who had ICIs prior to dose 1. Patient-reported symptoms after C19 Vaccine: Of 6388 pts, 4714 (74% response rate, median age 67y, range 16-95y) completed 16485 PRO surveys. After 2 doses, seniors reported lower mean scores vs mid-age or AYAs on 22 of 36 symptoms including injection site pain, palpitations, itch, rash, malaise, fevers/chills, arthralgia, myalgia, headache, pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, distress (p < 0.05). Pts w prior ICIs had higher severity of itch, rash (p < 0.05) from baseline after both dose 1 & 2 vs pts without systemic tx. Post dose 1, pts with prior ICI had higher increase in fatigue, malaise, itch, rash, myalgia, anorexia from their baseline vs pts without systemic tx (p < 0.05). C19 Outcomes: Of 6388 pts, 616 had a C19 test at any time post-dose 1: 23 (0.36%) tested positive of whom 20 (0.3%) were between dose 1 & 2;two (0.031%) were within 7 days post-dose 2, and one patient (0.016%) tested positive 16 days after dose 2, requiring admission. Conclusions: This real-world observational cohort demonstrates post-vaccine symptom burden and outcomes in patients with cancer. Second interim analysis is planned at 16 weeks.

Development and validation of a novel patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for symptom burden in patients with cancer and COVID-19 infection

Background: The symptom burden experienced by patients with cancer who contract the COVID-19 (C19) infection remains to be fully understood. To accurately assess this symptom burden, we developed a valid, reliable patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure of C19 symptoms combined with a known measure of cancer symptom burden. Methods: Within the institutional initiative on COVID-19 and cancer named Data- Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE), patients with cancer and PCR-positive C19 tests were invited to participate in this longitudinal study after providing consent. Pts completed the EQ-5D-5L and the 13 symptom severity and 6 interference items of the core MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) plus 14 COVID-specific symptom items generated from literature and expert review. Items were measured on a 0-10 scale, 0 = none to 10 = worst imaginable symptom or interference. Demographic and disease information was collected. Psychometric procedures determined validity and reliability of the MDASI-COVID. Results: 600 pts enrolled, mean age 56.5y (range 20 to 91y). 59% female, 80% white. 78% solid tumors, 19% heme cancers. 12.5% required hospitalization for C19. Median number of days between positive C19 test and PRO completion was 17 days. Mean overall health rating on EQ-5D-5L was 78.3 (SD 19.6), best being 100. Highest mean (M) severity symptoms on the MDASI-COVID were fatigue (M 3.45, SD 2.17), drowsiness (M 2.50, SD 2.89), sleep disturbance (M 2.44, SD 2.99), malaise (M 2.37, SD 3.05), and distress (M 2.27, SD 2.90). Most severe (≥ 7) symptoms) reported were fatigue (21.3% of pts), change in taste (14.8%), change in smell (14.4%), malaise (14.3%), sleep disturbance (14.3%), and drowsiness (14%). Internal consistency (Cronbach α) of the 27 symptom items was 0.957, of the 6 interference items was 0.937. Mean severity of the 27 symptom items was significantly correlated with overall EQ-5D-5L health rating (correlation = -0.45, P < 0.0005), demonstrating concurrent validity. Mean symptom severity and interference showed known-group validity between patients who required C19 hospitalization (symptom M 2.32, SD 2.09;interference M 3.29, SD 3.02) and those who did not (symptom M 1.69, SD 1.85;interference M 2.20, SD 2.64) (symptom P 0.007;interference P 0.004). Conclusions: We have validated a novel PRO, the MDASI-COVID, to quantify the combined symptom burden in patients with cancer and COVID-19. This measure allows longitudinal evaluation of COVID-19 on cancer symptom burden and provide clinicians with an accurate tool for ongoing symptom assessment and management. Longitudinal analysis on long-term symptoms related to COVID-19 and cancer are ongoing.

A sobering examination of how the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbates the disparities of vulnerable populations

Purpose Intersectionality theory is a social justice theory customarily employed to address inequities which arise in the academic or legal arenas as it relates to race and gender. The application of intersectionality theory extends beyond the convergence of multiple social identities. It provides an invaluable framework to examine the convergence of social identities, the social determinants of health and a global pandemic in communities of historically marginalized and underrepresented persons. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated the disparities experienced by African American and Latinx persons using the principles of intersectionality theory as the schema. Design/methodology/approach A literature review was performed on the scholarly articles examining the disproportionate incidence and mortality rates of African Americans and Latinx persons in America. Findings The current literature confirms that the disparities which existed prior to the onset of the coronavirus pandemic have been magnified by systemic oppression and racism of historically marginalized and underrepresented persons in America. The coronavirus pandemic has spotlighted the disparities in sustainable employment and access to health care for African American and Latinx persons. Originality/value Employing a social justice theoretical framework of intersectionality provides an opportunity to examine the lived experiences of African American and Latinx persons without race/ethnicity being the primary focal point. Future research will illustrate the urgent need for public health policy reform to eradicate the disparities experienced by African American and Latinx populations.